The
Core of Christianity
1
Corinthians 13
One
of the disadvantages of going through the Scripture is that you must take each
passage in turn. Some are
sufficiently dull that it takes some scratching (I, too, avoid genealogies).
But others, like this one, are so high and golden that one fears to bring
a lesson. It is a small shadow in a
land of giants. So with apologies to practically every great Christian
writer, we begin the golden love chapter of First Corinthians.
(1 Cor 13 NIV)
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am
only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. {2} If I have the gift of prophecy
and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can
move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. {3} If I give all I possess to
the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing.
{4} Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is
not proud. {5} It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered,
it keeps no record of wrongs. {6} Love does not delight in evil but rejoices
with the truth. {7} It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always
perseveres. {8} Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will
cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge,
it will pass away. {9} For we know in part and we prophesy in part, {10} but
when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears. {11} When I was a child, I
talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I
became a man, I put childish ways behind me. {12} Now we see but a poor
reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part;
then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known. {13} And now these three
remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.
Context
While
often quoted at weddings – it is a superbly beautiful writing – the context
of the message is quite clear. Paul
is still speaking about the unity of the church.
One of the causes of jealousy in the church has been the distribution of
spiritual gifts. Why should you get
divine healing when I speak in tongues? Which
is the greater gift? (And,
therefore, which of us is greater in the church?)
Such
division is contrary to the very nature of God, who is One.
His image in us must be likewise – one essence in many persons.
But what essence is this? Is
it not expressed in the thought, “God is love?”
Therefore Jesus tells us that this is the method by which all will know
we are his disciples – that we love one another.
This
love – the word is one which applies to the will, not to the emotions – is
the core of Christianity, as Paul shows us here.
Supremacy of love
Paul
brings this thought to us with a series of superlative comparisons which bring
up echoes of our Lord’s own words. It’s
interesting to see these
comparisons, for in each there is a subtlety which is at once hyperbole – and
delicacy:
Tongues
First,
note that it’s not just the “tongues of men” (the languages of earth) but
also the tongues of angels! Even if
I spoke like an angel of God, it would mean nothing without love.
But – in contrast to the others – here he does not use the phrase
“I am nothing.” He rather uses
a word picture – the clanging symbol, the gong.
You
want to drive parents of a small child absolutely crazy?
Give the kid a drum for Christmas (works with teenagers, too).
My mother tells me that when I was young someone gave me a metal drum –
practically unbreakable – and that she was soon forced to hide it.
I was the original Energizer bunny, evidently. That’s the kind of speaking Paul is talking about;
eloquence without love at its heart is brazen annoyance.
Prophecy
Here
again we get a magnificent hyperbole: not
only could I understand all knowledge (things that man is allowed to discover)
but also all mysteries (things deliberately hidden by God).
Suppose I knew all that; what
would the benefit be? Take even a
small example: suppose I have the
cure for cancer. If I will not act
on it, it will sit in my file cabinet, benefiting neither me nor anyone else.
Faith
It’s
our Lord’s own illustration, turned on its head. Christ told us that if we had a little faith, even like a
mustard seed, we could move mountains. Paul
takes that for the hyperbole it is, and says – even if you did, what good is
it? If you don’t have love, it
does no good.
Giving
Remember
the rich young ruler? In his case,
his possessions stood between him and God.
So, suppose I give away all my possessions. I benefit the poor who receive them; I remove all worldly barriers between me and God – but if I
do not have love, the Spirit of my Master, I cannot be one with him.
It’s
worse than that. “No greater love
has any man – “ remember that? If
you give your life for someone, that’s the greatest sign of love.
But if you don’t have that love, and give your life out of misguided
legalism (for example) it does you no good.
The
spiritual gifts are great gifts. But
remember that Saul prophesied; Balaam
spoke the oracle of God; Judas
worked miracles with the other disciples. All
these were evil men who had an evil end. What
did their spiritual gifts produce? The
Christians at Corinth had spiritual gifts too;
but they produced jealousy and faction.
Without love, it is always so.
The character of love
Here
it is: the checklist of Christian
love. Compare this:
the character of love shown here, and the character of that church.
Paul is pointing them to the “more excellent way.”
Positive
Paul
gives us two positive aspects to love:
The
answer is found at the Cross, where love makes the sacrifice which brings us to
righteousness. It is a model for
us. We are not to strike at evil
with evil; rather, we are to reach
out to those who are evil, in love.
The
good news here is this: love is so
much the attribute of God that when we become his children he enables us – if
we are willing – to act as he would act, in the imitation of his love.
Endurance of love
The
good stuff tends to stick around. Many
books were written in the 19th century; how many are read today?
Only two kinds: the good
ones and the ones on some English teacher’s list.
Sherlock Holmes is still in print; not
on the list, but good reading. How
much more, then, shall the supreme and best thing, love, endure?
Why do the others cease?
After all, many of us today would love to have the gift
of healing. Some of us would be
happy with just the gift of tongues (assuming the eldership voted to allow it).
But Paul tells us these will cease.
Why?