|
On the Inner
Life (Matthew 15-16) There is, perhaps, no problem so bedeviling the Christian Church as this: how do we lead the Spirit filled, inner life of Christ without tangling ourselves in a long list of rules, regulations and traditions? And how do we get untangled when we fail? We will look at this problem in two lights this morning: the Pharisees and a certain woman.
Well, most of us in this civilized (read: plumbing) age know to wash our hands before dinner. So the tradition of the Pharisees of washing the hands seems to us to be a reasonable one -- at least in terms of hygiene. What’s interesting is to see it as a religious tradition: the requirement is not for germs but for God. So then, does the Old Testament require the Jew to wash his hands before eating? Actually, no. There are several references to washing hands, but they all have to do with one of two things: · A requirement that the priests do so, in order that they may approach the altar in ceremonial cleanliness. · A metaphorical use which indicates the speaker was coming to God in purity and righteousness. How then did the Pharisees come to regard washing hands as required by God? We’re not exactly certain of this specific instance, but the general principle is well known. The writings of the rabbis were considered to have equal weight (indeed, in some instances greater weight) than those of the Scripture. We can imagine a sequence something like this: · The priest must approach God with clean hands. · We, the believers, also approach God when we thank him for the meal we are about to receive. · Therefore we should also approach him with clean hands. · Gradually, over time, the “good idea” becomes a commandment, weighted into the tradition. People in the Christian church like to state that no such thing happens in our congregation. Would you like the outstanding example to the contrary? Communion. Like many fundamentalist denominations, we serve grape juice at communion. Many people assume that this is exactly what Christ Himself used, but it is not. If you read the words in all the translations I have available to me, the phrase “grape juice” never occurs. “Fruit of the vine” (ambiguous) is used, but in all other references wine is used. And for 1800 years of Christianity nothing but wine was used -- until the 19th century in America and England. How did we get to this point? We arrived here because of the charmingly misnamed “Temperance” movement (temperance actually means moderation, not abstinence.) The argument went something like this: · It’s just possible that there is someone out there in the congregation who is (in today’s phrasing) a recovering alcoholic. · That person might be tempted back into a life of alcoholism by the mere smell of the wine used in the Lord’s Supper. · We should refrain from doing anything which would tempt our weaker brother. · Therefore, we should not use wine in Communion, but (taking advantage of the King James English) substitute “fruit of the vine” or “cup” -- meaning grape juice. Interestingly, the major advocate of this point of view was a grape grower who specialized in grapes not suitable for winemaking; Concord grapes, to be specific. His name was Welch -- as in Welch’s Grape Juice. This has gone so far as to have elaborate explanations of how the word for wine in the Greek didn’t really mean wine -- at least in the passages relating to the Lord’s Supper. The identical word in passages dealing with drinking wine, of course, remained clearly wine. The point is not about wine. The point is to see how, over time, we have substituted our tradition for the clear statement of the Scripture. It sounds so reasonable, there are good arguments at the time, and -- key point -- those who oppose such actions are usually not the “scholars.” And that brings us to the root of the problem. Who’s in charge? You can see the problem. It is not the “ordinary” Christian who falls into this trap (though they usually support it); it is the learned Christian. The prestige of being a Sunday School teacher is one thing; think of what it’s like to be the senior pastor of a church of three thousand people. So many people would view his word as completely authoritative -- all the more so in a society where formal education might be limited. And the problem presented to the leader is not one of “would you like to be a Pharisee?” but rather, “what’s the answer to this problem?” The answer all too often turns out to be, “let’s make it a rule.” And there is the problem; making the rules. In making the rules we set the trap of legalism. We cannot avoid making decisions. The temptation is to promote them to the same status as the Scripture. Rather, as Christ is about to make clear, our first duty is to follow him. If that means consumption of alcohol, then let us be all things to all men so that by all means we may win some to Christ. Indeed, I wonder if our lack of evangelism may not, in part, be due to our strict observance of the rules -- which tells the world (though it shouldn’t) that “before you become a Christian you must...” The unfortunate thing is this: sometimes we can’t tell the difference, even in ourselves. For some of us, it should be a rule of life never to touch alcohol. This is yet another reason to “judge not.” Let us plead, then, for true tolerance, true temperance. This is another example of Oswald Chamber’s principle: the good is the enemy of the best. It is good to have sound rules for life. It is best to follow Jesus. OK, I’m alarmed -- how do I tell when decisions have become rules have become traditions? Here’s a test:
Why do the Pharisees ask Jesus for a “sign?” (A miracle) I submit there are two reasons: · They have taken upon themselves the decisions regarding what God wants. In short, they have taken up the authority of God, and are now accustomed to issuing statements saying, “Thus saith the Lord.” They see their authority as divine; your role is to obey. If someone claims to be an alternate authority, He’d better have pretty good evidence! · Their lives are not based on faith, but upon works. They have no need for faith -- so everything must be based on proof. (Hence the endless wrangling over the smallest details). So Jesus tells his disciples to be on their guard against the “leaven” of the Pharisees. Leaven works invisibly; so does this principle. The Law was sent as schoolmaster to point us to Christ; not as tyrant. The Woman
It is no accident that this section is sandwiched between two episodes with the Pharisees. She is the contrast; she is the right answer. Consider her not so much as the example of faith as the contrast to the Pharisees: · The rules are all against her. The Messiah, the Christ, was sent to Israel alone -- and you got that right from the source. “What part of ‘no’ don’t you understand?” · She has none of the merit of the righteous -- and claims none. There is not a word of how deserving she is; how innocent her daughter. · But note this well: she begs. She begs in the face of rejection. The grace seeker turns even rejection into grace! Here is the cure. How often have we had Jesus reject our prayers, only to see us go away and sulk. Our pride will not allow us to take his rejection as a way of humbling us -- for if we will not humble ourselves in his sight, he will do it for us -- so we sulk away. Look at the example of faith! Rejection brings humility; humility bases itself on grace -- and God is gracious. I can find no words better than those of Matthew Henry’s Commentary to express this: Many
methods of Christ's providence, especially of his grace, in dealing with his
people, which are dark and perplexing, may be explained by this story, which
teaches that there may be love in Christ's heart while there are frowns in his
face; and it encourages us, though he seems ready to slay us, yet to trust in
him. Those whom Christ intends most to honour, he humbles to feel their own
unworthiness. A proud, unhumbled heart would not have borne this; but she turned
it into an argument to support her request. The state of this woman is an emblem
of the state of a sinner, deeply conscious of the misery of his soul. The least
of Christ is precious to a believer, even the very crumbs of the Bread of life.
Of all graces, faith honours Christ most; therefore of all graces Christ honours
faith most. He cured her daughter. He spake, and it was done. From hence let
such as seek help from the Lord, and receive no gracious answer, learn to turn
even their unworthiness and discouragements into pleas for mercy. O So, then, the inner life, the life of humility before God, is the desired thing. How do I achieve it? How do I get to Carnegie Hall? PRACTICE! So what, then, should I practice? ·
First, do not neglect the role of the Holy Spirit in your life.
How do I do that?
· Second, practice the devotional life. The things you do in secret will be shown in public: ? Prayer, of course, is most important. Do you keep a journal of your prayers? ? Devotional reading -- there are many authors whose lives would turn yours around, if you would let them; ? Oswald Chambers, My Utmost for His Highest ? Thomas à Kempis, The Imitation of Christ ? Regular Scripture reading -- and meditating on what you have read ? Fasting (not much practiced, but recommended!) · Finally, work out what you have worked in. Take the lessons learned in secret with God and deliberately apply them to your life. Say to yourself, “I will forgive that person;” “I will treat that one with great kindness despite what he has done;” “I will give aid and comfort to that person, no matter how undeserving.” “I will put up with what that person does.” Your Father sends his rain on the just and the unjust; be his child. It may be that you look at this and say, “no way. I can’t do that. I just don’t have that kind of humility to allow myself to be treated that way. I have my pride.” There is no sinner so foul that he cannot deal with the sin and love the sinner. If your humility is not sufficient, use His: Because
you still love yourself too inordinately, you are afraid to resign yourself
wholly to the will of others. Is it such a great matter if you, who are but dust
and nothingness, subject yourself to man for the sake of God, when I, the
All-Powerful, the Most High, Who created all things out of nothing, humbly
subjected Myself to man for your sake? I became the most humble and the lowest
of all men that you might overcome your pride with My humility. (Thomas à Kempis) Ignore your pride; take your Lord’s humility, and learn. His burden is easy; His yoke is light. |