Would you like your children (or
your grandchildren, as your age permits) to grow up to be rich? Would you be
willing to pay for his education in medical or law school to make it come
about? Then consider the words of John Chrysostom, as he gave advice on what
trade school you should choose for your child:
"You
will effect nothing so great by teaching him an art, and giving him that
outward learning by which he will gain riches, as if you teach him the art of
despising riches. If you desire to make him rich, do this. For the rich man
is not he who desires great riches, and is encircled with great riches; but the
man who has need of nothing."
Right Relationships
When I first thought about this
lesson, I considered skipping it. After all, most of my students do not have
small children at home, and they might consider it a little late. But even
grandparents have a role to play: that of those who teach the teachers of the
young:
(Titus 2:1-8 NIV) You
must teach what is in accord with sound doctrine. {2} Teach the older
men to be temperate, worthy of respect, self-controlled, and sound in faith, in
love and in endurance. {3} Likewise, teach the older women to be
reverent in the way they live, not to be slanderers or addicted to much wine,
but to teach what is good. {4} Then they can train the younger women to
love their husbands and children, {5} to be self-controlled and pure, to
be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no
one will malign the word of God. {6} Similarly, encourage the young men
to be self-controlled. {7} In everything set them an example by doing
what is good. In your teaching show integrity, seriousness {8} and
soundness of speech that cannot be condemned, so that those who oppose you may
be ashamed because they have nothing bad to say about us.
So we see that sound doctrine
never arrives too late in life. To begin, then, we need to know the root of
sound relationships:
(Rom 13:7 NIV) Give everyone what you owe him: If you
owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if
honor, then honor.
In Paul's letter to the
Ephesians, we see the progression of such relationships somewhat in descending
order, but always with this principle. These relationships have been shown to
us in this order:
·
The Trinity itself, and creation
·
Christ and the church
·
The church leaders and the church members
·
Husbands and wives
·
And now fathers and children.
Children
The value of Children
It is difficult for us to
conceive of different times and ages being anything but either a) agreeing with
us, since we are so wise, or b) being very primitive indeed. This is
chronological snobbery. It is instructive to see how children are considered
in three different views:
·
The Roman View. Children had an extremely low status in
the Roman world. Indeed, when first born, they could literally be thrown out
of the house - usually for the fault of being female. This was the Roman
equivalent of abortion. Such children were, theoretically, exposed to die.
However, it was a common thing for a midwife to take the child to the
marketplace and leave it there - to be raised as a temple prostitute or slave.
Even later in life the child was still under the absolute power of the father.
A father could arbitrarily disown his child at any age, or disinherit him. At
least in theory, the Roman father had absolute power over his grown children -
and this power was exercised sufficiently often to be noticed. Children were
considered a necessary burden.
·
The Modern View. Children today still suffer - a million
and more times a year - from abortion. Technology has made it swifter, but the
result is almost the same. We, however, have no mercy. We think that children
have "always" been abused, and that we have only recently uncovered
that fact. I suspect the opposite is true; abuse is growing rapidly. We hold
with this idea the contrary opinion that children - especially those portrayed
on television - are the fount of wisdom for their stupid parents. Only the
young are worthy - and therefore who are we, the old and feeble minded, to
attempt to instruct them? And certainly not in things Biblical; after all,
the Bible is strictly for preachers. Much better to let them grow up without
it so they can make up their own minds when they grow up.
·
The Biblical View. In the Biblical view children are a
gift from God. God places them in our care for a little while, but they are
very precious to Him. Our Lord himself said that of such is the kingdom.
Since they are a trust placed upon us, we must take such care of them as God
might command. In this section, Paul places upon fathers just such a duty.
First, however, we shall examine the duty children have to their parents.
The Duty of Children to their
Parents
Like all the sections we have
seen before, there is the element of submission. Paul's writing here is very
short; I suspect that this is because he knew the letter would be read aloud
in the churches. Therefore, he made the section addressed to children suitable
for them. In particular
·
It is very short.
·
It does not deal with high theology, but rather with practical
problems and promises - honor to your parents and long life.
"Honor your father and
mother" - what does that word mean? The Greek word means to prize, or to
value, to give respect to. It does not mean, as Paul does state elsewhere,
obey. But the concept certainly includes obedience. The primary idea,
however, is not obedience but honor and respect. We note that even Christ was
obedient to his earthly parents.
This honor is not limited to small children. Hear how Paul gives some
practical instruction on the subject to Timothy:
(1 Tim 5:4 NIV) But if
a widow has children or grandchildren, these should learn first of all to put
their religion into practice by caring for their own family and so repaying
their parents and grandparents, for this is pleasing to God.
There is, however, a qualifier:
"in the Lord." The expectation is that the parents being so honored
are indeed "in the Lord." Partly this is to prevent slavish
obedience to evil parents. But more to the point, it is also to encourage the
parents to be the kind of parents they should be.
The Duty of Fathers
Why is such a thing commanded?
It may seem a foolish question.
After all, parents should love their children, and that should be sufficient.
But instruction is never without a reason:
·
There is the time honored folly - Chrysostom cited it in his
homily - of deciding to wait until they are grown to educate children in the
faith. This simply does not work. Parents who do this are uniformly amazed at
how unwilling their grown children are to accept such instruction. Perhaps the
example of their parents - saying, "this is not important, wait until
later" - had something to do with it.
·
The children of this time had heroes, as do ours. These heroes
were the ones of classical Greek and Roman mythology, and a poor lot of role
models they are. My younger son contends that Achilles would best have been
played by Errol Flynn, both being drunkards and womanizers.
·
Finally, there is this: if a man will not honor his parents, how
can you expect him to have a sound personal relationship with anyone else? If
the man who gave him life and the woman who gave him birth are not respected
and honored, who can be?
Why Fathers?
Why not "parents?"
After all, we live in feminist, egalitarian times - surely Paul could see that
this is the obvious right answer.
·
It may be obvious to us, but someone might try explaining it to
God. He intends that authority exist, and that it be exercised properly. His
pattern for the family is to have the man in charge. And that places
responsibility upon the father.
·
Ultimately, authority must be calm and self-disciplined to be of
effect. Consider the police officer who stops you. One of you is calm; one is
nervous - which one is in control? And of the husband and wife, which one is
most likely to have a fit of temper?
·
My father taught me the principle: the child honors father and
mother; father is in charge - and therefore mother takes no sass from her
kids. I put it to the women: if the man is truly in charge, and truly loves
his wife (and shows his children this) then how can the children fail to
respect their mother? And have you ever seen these roles reversed?
·
Finally, there is this: if you will not be disciplined by and
respect the father you can see, how can you be disciplined by and respect the
Father you cannot?
The principles for Fathers
There are three bits of advice
for fathers that Paul gives here, and all are timeless:
First, he says do not
"exasperate" your children. The Greek has two words tied together in
this. The first is "para", from which we get our word
"parallel", which means "to be along side." The second is
"orge", from which we get our word "orgy", which really
means an outburst of uncontrolled passion. We are to treat our children so
that we do not bring them to the point of bursting out in uncontrolled passion.
Next, and note the parallel to
the way the Lord disciplines us, is the concept of training. The root of this
in the Greek word is the concept of repetition; the King James used the word
"nurture," as one would care for plants in a garden. This is not a
favorite concept of educators today, for repetition - drill, for the math
teacher - is not nearly as much fun as other aspects of teaching. He did not
say that it is fun; he said is was required. Remember how the children were
to be taught the Passover each year?
Indeed, failure to provide such repetitive training is considered a rejection
of your children - disowning them:
(Heb 12:7-8 NIV)
Endure hardship as discipline; God is treating you as sons. For what son is not
disciplined by his father? {8} If you are not disciplined (and everyone
undergoes discipline), then you are illegitimate children and not true sons.
Finally, there is instruction.
The word in the King James is "admonition." It is a word which means
teaching in the intellectual sense. If repetition drills things into the soul,
this is the way to the mind. Proverbs is the book of such instruction (along
with James in the New Testament). Interestingly, Proverbs gives us
illustrations which indicate that such teaching is not just for early
childhood:
·
Proverbs 4:1-9 is a clear lesson on the value of wisdom for the
young child.
·
But Proverbs 6:20-35 (and also Proverbs 23:22-35) are clearly
lessons to a child who is contemplating adultery!
So we see that even older
children are to be instructed by their parents! If you see your grown child
chasing after another man's wife, would you not warn him?
There it is: another example of
the right relationship. Each has duties to the other; the child to honor the
parents, the father to treat the child gently but firmly, training and
instructing him. To each as is his due. Next week, we shall see the same
principle found in our daily living.