We
close the study of this letter with Paul’s “thank you” note. In it, he
explains much in the relationship between giver and receiver, and comments on
the art of receiving and having.
(Phil 4:10-23 NIV) I rejoice greatly in the Lord that at
last you have renewed your concern for me. Indeed, you have been concerned, but
you had no opportunity to show it. {11} I am not saying this because I am in
need, for I have learned to be content whatever the circumstances. {12} I know
what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned
the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or
hungry, whether living in plenty or in want. {13} I can do everything through
him who gives me strength. {14} Yet it was good of you to share in my troubles.
{15} Moreover, as you Philippians know, in the early days of your acquaintance
with the gospel, when I set out from Macedonia, not one church shared with me
in the matter of giving and receiving, except you only; {16} for even when I
was in Thessalonica, you sent me aid again and again when I was in need. {17}
Not that I am looking for a gift, but I am looking for what may be credited to
your account. {18} I have received full payment and even more; I am amply
supplied, now that I have received from Epaphroditus the gifts you sent. They
are a fragrant offering, an acceptable sacrifice, pleasing to God. {19} And my
God will meet all your needs according to his glorious riches in Christ Jesus.
{20} To our God and Father be glory for ever and ever. Amen. {21} Greet all the
saints in Christ Jesus. The brothers who are with me send greetings. {22} All
the saints send you greetings, especially those who belong to Caesar's
household. {23} The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen.
Giving is for the giver
You
cannot help but notice in this passage how politely Paul thanks his hearers.
He’s glad to have the gift, but he really doesn’t need it – and the more you
read it, the more it seems Paul is fumbling over the words. He’s not. He’s
trying to strike the correct balance of words which properly portrays the right
relationship between giver and receiver, and the value of giving. He must do
this because we are so steeped in the world’s view of giving.
World’s view of giving
So
what, then, is the world’s view of giving? It is simply this: the primary
beneficiary of giving is the receiver. Now that sounds so obvious that we
might need to recall the Scripture to understand that it is proclaimed false:
(Acts 20:35 NIV) In everything I did, I showed you that by
this kind of hard work we must help the weak, remembering the words the Lord
Jesus himself said: 'It is more blessed to give than to receive.'"
So
the common world view is at odds with what the Scripture has to say. This is
not so unusual, but it strikes us as such because we are talking about giving –
charity, in the modern sense of that word.
You
can see this best in its corollary. If the recipient is the primary beneficiary,
then the recipient must be, somehow, “worthy.” You don’t given money to keep
drunken bums on the unemployment rolls – because they aren’t worthy.
A
great example of this came from Jocelyn Elders, one of the women nominated to
become Surgeon General of the United States. In her testimony before Congress,
she said that the reason we had not achieved a cure for AIDS (this was 1992)
was that “right wing fundamentalist Christians” were responsible. Her
reasoning was straightforward:
- You
don’t give money (either by charity or tax dollars) to those who are not
worthy.
- “Right
wing fundamentalists” are so judgmental and wrong-headed they actually
think homosexuality is morally wrong.
- Therefore,
they would not want their tax dollars going to help homosexuals – they got
into this mess by themselves, they can get out by themselves.
- Hence
Congress had not approved enough funding, hence the disease still exists.
Now
– ignoring her ignorance of how Christians think – this is exactly a picture of
the world’s view of charity. She simply projected it upon Christians.
But
wait! What about the giver? If the beneficiary is the recipient, what
motivates the giver? Public charities have given much thought to that!
- One
motive is ego. Get your name on the plaque on the wall, your photo with
the mayor at the dedication. Be applauded by the crowd.
- Another
is relief from guilt. Have you made your millions by sharp practice and
fraud? Do you know yourself to be living on the ragged edge of right and
wrong? Give a few million to charity, and become a wonderful, righteous
guy.
- Curiously,
a third is vengeance – vengeance upon the misfortunes you suffered in
life.
A
story is told of this about Andrew Carnegie. As a little boy in Scotland, he
found that the rich man in town invited all the children to his estate once a
year for a grand party. All the children, that is, except his family. His
mother had rejected the rich man as a suitor in younger life. When he had made
his fortune, the rich man’s castle came up for sale. Carnegie bought it – made
it his own – and opened it up to all the children of the town, without
exception.
Much
earthly good is done by such charity. Carnegie was a generous man who
influenced many other American millionaires to participate in charity in a
generous way – he started a fashion for it. But this is not the way of the
kingdom, for the kingdom of God deals with the heart.
The view from the kingdom of God
You
will have no trouble in guessing the view: the primary beneficiary is the
giver. How can this be?
- First,
the giver becomes more like God. If I give so that you may eat, and I
become like Christ, which of the two of us has benefited the most from the
gift?
- In
so doing, love – the primary virtue – abounds.
- Likewise,
if I give for God’s sake, then it is God who will reward me. And whose
reward could be greater?
This
also changes the requirement that the recipient be “worthy.” We were not
worthy when our heavenly Father sent his Son. We are thus relieved of the
burden of determining worthiness.
- Our
recipient may be very worthy (say, a missionary).
- Our
recipient may be completely unworthy (the unwed mother).
- But
one thing for sure: the poor we always have with us.
The virtue of little, the virtue of much
We
must now examine one of the great virtues proclaimed to the Christian:
contentment. Whether we have very little, or very much, contentment is both
commanded and given. Here is the secret of being the recipient of the giver’s
gift. What can we see about this thing called contentment?
- First,
it must be learned – it is not something that happens automatically. We
must study how to do it, and practice it. So many people think it will
fall out of the sky
- Next,
this is not the denial of trouble (“nothing’s wrong”) but the art of
leaving that trouble with the Lord.
- How
does one do this? By relying on God’s precepts and promises.
“A
gracious spirit is a contented spirit,” said Chrysostom. If we are full of the
grace of God, exhibiting his mercy and kindness, then we shall find contentment
a normal outcome.
We
need to know how to do this, both with very little and very much.
Contentment with little
The
secret to contentment with little is this: we must become rich. How? The
matter is simple: when your possessions exceed your wants, you are rich. So
therefore, the secret is in the control of our wants.
For
those with little, this means recognizing and conquering the sin of envy. We
see others around us with more, and we ask, “Why can’t I have a 75’ yacht
too?” Is the problem that we don’t have the yacht, or is the problem that we
want the yacht – especially because someone else has it? (Have you ever wanted
what no one has? Did anyone in Paul’s time envy you because you have a
television set?)
How
can we control such envy? “I can do everything through him who gives me
strength.”
Contentment with much
Those
who think they have little often imagine they would be content if they had
much. Those who have much know better. How then does the rich man achieve
contentment?
Begin
with this: to whom do you give thanks for your blessings? A thankful heart
places your wealth in its proper perspective.
Why
is this so necessary? Because of the sin of greed – the ever-present desire
for “more.” No amount can be enough for those who have fallen into greed, but
the thankful heart knows: “if more is needed, more will be provided.” After
all, the Lord’s been mighty good to you so far, hasn’t he? What makes you
think he will stop now?
The
secret, again, is “I can do everything through him who gives me strength.”
The fellowship of troubles – and giving
So
now we come to the building of the church – fellowship. The word translated
“sharing” in verse 14 can also be translated ‘sharing in fellowship”. The
secret of this fellowship is simply in the purpose of mind. Paul, the poor
recipient, shares the same purpose of mind as the rich Philippians who are
giving to him. God, who looks on the heart (remember the Widow’s Mite?) acts
accordingly to both.
The desire of their teacher
Paul
is their teacher, and in this matter of giving he gives us two practical
lessons:
- We
should not wait for others to give. The Philippians were the first and
for some time the only ones supporting Paul in his work.
- We
should give repeatedly. This is not the first time the Philippians have
provided for Paul.
In
this we need to see that such giving is an offering to God. Now we know that
God does not need such offerings (see Psalm 50), but that he rewards such
giving. It is this reward that Paul desires for them.
Fellowship of affliction
We
view affliction and suffering as terrible things. But this is not always the
case. Chrysostom put it beautifully: “Affliction is an unbroken bond, the
increase of love and the occasion of compunction and piety.”
- Unbroken bond – is there anything like shared suffering to bond
you to another person? Does not affliction weld the church together in
times of trouble?
- Increase of love – when affliction comes to one of us, it is the
chance for all of us to show our love for that one. In such, love
increases, the world sees it – and by this they know we are his disciples.
- Occasion of compunction and piety – in all these things we have a
chance to give with good will for the recipient and honor in the sight of
God. Think of it: if I gave you a chance to be blessed by both man and
God, would you not take it? Giving blesses the giver most.